Three advert ruled misleading by ASA

Written by: Samantha Tomaszczyk
Three advert ruled misleading by ASA

The advertising regulator has said Three must change its adverts on contract deals to make it clearer that monthly charges are not fixed

An advert detailing contract deals from Three has been banned by the advertising standards authority (ASA) for being ‘misleading.’

The ASA ruled today that the advert, which features various pay monthly deals from Three, “must not appear again in its current form”.

It follows a complaint from a customer who said it did not make clear that Three could increase the monthly price within the term of the contract.

Three increased some monthly tariffs in the middle of this year in line with RPI.

Although the ASA noted that the advert did not say monthly tariffs would remain fixed for the duration of the contract, it said that “without any further qualification, consumers would be likely to understand that those prices would remain fixed for the entire term of the contract.”

It said that as the price of the contract was likely to be very important to the customer, and risk that it would be increased “amounted to a significant term, which should have been made clear.”

As well as telling Three to change the advert, the ASA told the operator to “ensure that they made any significant terms clear in future.”

Three had argued that because that was the first RPI increase in nine years, “it would not be reasonable to have expected them to reference that contractual term in every piece of marketing they had done for the last ten years on the basis that they may one day exercise that provision.”

Leave a Reply

To advertise on this site, call 0203 122 0872

Recent Comments

That's your opinion, but it certainly wasn't the best way of phrasing it. That wasn't the only reason the EE advisor scored so poorly, which is made clear in the full review in issue 582 of Mobil...
your mystery caller clearly doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. that is not insensitive at all. quite the opposite....
I think you've entirely missed the point there, Marc. It's not about telling someone to go out to the shop (although that often loses points any way as its rare someone calls up a telesales line ...
I have to say, if you are indeed a blind person you should know it is a lot easier to actually go into a shop and feel the phone for yourself. your first comment about EE slammed them when in fac...
How can i place my contacts in order by first names please. Thank you Mrs Doreen Haggar ....
Only 2 months ago i buy this phone. Please advice any body knows...
I have bought a huawei ascend p7 suddenly networ operator inactive. How to active this?...
A good point made in the previous comment, but it was just the field facing engineers that were outsourced not all engineers. Some have since been insourced (QoS, radio planning etc). But agre...
I will just add that EE is a complete rip off. They clearly don't have good reception in quite a few places. This is London I'm talking about as well! I consistently call then complaining t...
Maybe they shouldn't have outsourced all their Engineers to Ericsson then! They were warned they were putting the network at risk, did they care? Did they heck, all comes down to the money and th...

Social Media Feed